7 Jun 2017
張 對 謝
- Citation
- 張 對 謝
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC256/2000
Court inferred respondent's monthly income at not less than HK$26,000 from bank deposits and industry rates, rejected respondent's asserted monthly expenses as exaggerated and lacking evidence (reasonably assessed at HK$22,000), leaving a monthly surplus of HK$4,000 which the respondent is ordered to pay to the applicant as maintenance; proper service was effected and hearing proceeded in respondent's absence.