12 Jan 1995
R. v. AU WEI KEI
- Citation
- R. v. AU WEI KEI
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC356/1994
The Court held the trial judge did not err in principle or in fact: the five year starting point for the first charge was not excessive given the $1.4 million loss; the one third guilty plea reduction was appropriate; the second offence occurred later, involved different victims and motivation, and the judge's order that the two year sentence run from the end of two years of the three years four months sentence was not wrong in principle; the aggregate four year term was not manifestly excessive.