29 Nov 1994
DAVID HOT BLOCKING PRESS LIMITED v. HO KING YAM
- Citation
- DAVID HOT BLOCKING PRESS LIMITED v. HO KING YAM
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCLA56/1994
Employer failed to discharge the statutory onus of proving a break in continuity; by applying s.3 and the First Schedule the employee's service met the statutory tests (including the 18‑hour week rule and the pre‑commencement counting) so continuous employment dated back to 1977 and the employee was entitled to long service payment; employer's repayment claim was rejected and appeal dismissed.