8 Aug 2016
AA AND ANOTHER v. THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION
- Citation
- AA AND ANOTHER v. THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCAL41/2016
Substituted service on the FSA and SESC by international courier was granted under Order 65 rule 4(1) because formal diplomatic channels were impracticable and the applicants demonstrated the Japanese agencies had received the applicants' solicitors' letter of 17 May 2016; the setting aside of the ex parte leave is to be heard together with the substantive judicial review (rolled-up) for case management and efficiency, allowing merits to be considered in relation to the extension of time issue.