23 Oct 2015
SUN YAN v. SUPERB JADE LTD AND OTHERS
- Citation
- SUN YAN v. SUPERB JADE LTD AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA813/2014
The applicants failed to prove a real likelihood of substantial loss from the Mareva injunction; although the plaintiff is essentially a foreign plaintiff with only a flimsy connection to Hong Kong (which in principle justifies fortification), the existing fortification of $1,000,000 already paid is adequate protection; accordingly the application for further fortification is dismissed and the applicants ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs (order nisi).