15 Nov 2022
M v. G
- Citation
- [2022] HKFC 242
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMP36/2022
The originating summons for leave was dismissed because the applicant failed to discharge the burden of proving a "substantial connection" between the husband and Hong Kong as required by s29AE(c) MPPO — there was no evidence of the husband's physical presence or Hong Kong residency and the mere shareholding in a Hong Kong company was insufficient to establish a substantial connection; additionally the supporting affidavit failed to meet rule 103A requirements.