21 Feb 2019
CHU TIK KWONG 對 CHOW CHUNG HEI及另二人
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 499
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP1736/2015
The 15 May 2012 transfer was a gratuitous disposition made when the transferor lacked assets to satisfy the pre-existing judgment debt, thereby creating a significant risk creditors could not recover; the court inferred intent to defraud under s60 CPO and held the transfer void. The plaintiff, having discontinued only because the judgment sum was paid, is entitled to costs from 1 August 2016 against the defendants; the costs are to be assessed under the Regional Court scale and, if not agreed, by a costs assessment officer.