4 Jan 2021
香港特別行政區 訴 張錦輝
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 23
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA90/2019
The application for a certificate was refused because the court concluded the contested legal points were previously considered and rejected in the judge's earlier judgment, the applicant merely re‑argued those conclusions without raising a new, reasonably arguable point of law of broad and general public importance, and therefore did not satisfy the threshold for a certificate under s32(2) CFAO; the impugned provisions are not shown to be unconstitutional on the material before the court.