25 Feb 2013
黄旭輝 v. CHAN KIM WAH AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- 黄旭輝 v. CHAN KIM WAH AND ANOTHER
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ2277/2012
The Assignment was a gratuitous disposition unsupported by consideration, made at a time when Chan was insolvent or such disposition rendered him insolvent, the Property being his sole asset and Chan owing the plaintiff HK$500,000; in the absence of any explanation the irresistible inference of intent to defraud creditors arises under the rule in Freeman v Pope and section 60 is engaged, rendering the Assignment voidable and to be set aside.