16 Sept 2021
HKSAR v. TAM HO NAM
- Citation
- [2021] HKCA 1384
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC219/2019
The admissions of the Ambulance Conversation did not prejudice the trial; the alleged deficiencies in directions (Liberato and Mushtaq) were not material because the required messages were conveyed when the summing-up is read as a whole, the applicant had previously made formal s65C admissions of voluntariness and did not withdraw them, and the claim of oppression was not credibly established; failure to give propensity limb did not render trial unfair in context of an admitted brutal killing; conviction was safe and appeal dismissed.