25 Jan 2000
THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF REPULSE BAY TOWER v. THOMAS LING & VICTOR CHAN t/a LING CHAN & PARTNERS
- Citation
- THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF REPULSE BAY TOWER v. THOMAS LING & VICTOR CHAN t/a LING CHAN & PARTNERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT100/1999
The application to substitute or strike out parties under Order 15 r.6 was refused because the competing claims about the identity of the contracting party and alleged novation are factual issues requiring discovery, evidence and cross-examination and are therefore not suitable for final determination in interlocutory proceedings; the plaintiff is entitled to have those factual issues tried.