13 Nov 2012
香港特別行政區 訴 黃浩炘
- Citation
- 香港特別行政區 訴 黃浩炘
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC128/2012
The Court held that the trial judge erred in raising the sentencing benchmark to 3 years 3 months for this offence; the appropriate benchmark was 3 years, reduced by one‑third for the guilty plea to 2 years custody; 8 months of that sentence is to run concurrently with the sentence in DCCC 1139/2011, producing an effective total term of 2 years 10 months, and the original combined effective sentence of 3 years 4 months concurrent leading to 3 years 4 months plus 2 years 2 months (treated as 5 years) was manifestly excessive.