13 Sept 2019
HKSAR v. MOHAMMED TOFAEL AHMED
- Citation
- [2019] HKCA 1045
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC306/2018
The court held that the one‑transaction rule did not apply to Charges 1–3 but it was reasonably arguable that Charges 3 and 4 derived from a common stock and should have been treated together for sentencing; consequently the judge may have erred in the exercise of the totality principle by imposing excessive consecutive elements for Charges 3 and 4 and leave to appeal on that limited basis was granted.