31 May 2010
HKSAR v. TSE TAT FUNG
- Citation
- HKSAR v. TSE TAT FUNG
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC167/2008
Majority: Although ICAC memory‑refreshing went beyond ideal practice (summaries used) that impropriety affected weight not admissibility; the trial judge properly treated immunised witnesses with caution, looked for supporting evidence and was entitled to accept substantial parts of their testimony (notably Raymond Leung) supported by documentary and circumstantial evidence; convictions and sentences were therefore safe and appeals dismissed (save that McMahon J dissented on convictions of 4th defendant for charges 1,2,9,10 on grounds of inadequate reasoning).