WINNER CO (HK) LTD v. ARTHUR A. SEIDMAN & CO
- Citation
- WINNER CO (HK) LTD v. ARTHUR A. SEIDMAN & CO
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV10/1971
The Full Court affirmed the trial judge's findings of fact that Exh. P.1 was the sample sent by the defendants and that the bulk did not correspond with it; that the goods were therefore in breach of the implied condition under s17 Sale of Goods Ordinance; consequential losses (loss of profit and loss on resale) including storage, insurance and bank interest were direct and natural results of the breach and recoverable under s55; the judge did not err on burden of proof or by relying on witness demeanour; and the court properly exercised its discretion under s30A to award interest. The appeal…