26 Sept 1995
R. v. LAI CHUN TONG
- Citation
- R. v. LAI CHUN TONG
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC333/1995
The Court held there was no substance to the complaint under Article 10 because the two groups of offences lacked a common factual origin and were of different nature and times, so no oppression or prima facie prejudice was shown; the identity of investigators did not by itself render the appellant's cautioned statement inadmissible; the trial judge's reliance on the statement was not inconsistent with finding the appellant an untruthful witness; identification evidence was properly dealt with under Turnbull — therefore the appeal is dismissed.