15 Mar 2019
HKSAR v. YIK SIU HUNG
- Citation
- [2019] HKCA 337
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC176/2015
Taken at its highest the prosecution evidence permitted compelling inferences that the applicant was complicit in the agreement to make false representations and dealt with proceeds of the offence; a jury properly directed could convict, so the judge was correct to refuse no‑case submissions; renewal of an unarguable leave application after considered refusal justified a 2‑month loss‑of‑time order under s83W(1) CPO.