23 Dec 2022
香港特別行政區 訴 張嘉橋及另一人
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 3810
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA256/2022
The convictions were upheld because the trial judge validly accepted the fingerprint and palmprint evidence linking the appellants to the seized cigarettes and the contemporaneously found notebooks and delivery papers; those documents, though hearsay in content, legitimately supported an inference of connection without expert proof; the surrounding circumstances (premises, open boxes, identity documents) corroborated knowledge and handling and there was no basis to overturn the factual findings.