27 Aug 2014
SUZANNE RUTH HENDERSON v. SCOTT HENDERSON
- Citation
- SUZANNE RUTH HENDERSON v. SCOTT HENDERSON
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP1780/2013
The Hartmann Order was interpreted as imposing mandatory interim payment obligations to the FRO; the slip rule could not be used to recast the order substantively but the court allowed a limited amendment to add a required payment mechanism; the defendant had breached the order by withdrawing salary without paying the support and, exercising its inherent jurisdiction (and on the footing of Order 45 r8), the court ordered payment of accrued support (CAD 117,288), continued and tightened stop‑gap freezing measures prohibiting salary withdrawals until the mechanism is in place, and awarded costs…