22 Dec 2014
LAI HOI PING AND ANOTHER v. PERSONS OCCUPYING PORTIONS OF NATHAN ROAD NEAR TO AND BETWEEN ARGYLE STREET AND DUNDAS STREET TO PREVENT OR OBSTRUCT NORMAL VEHICULAR TRAFFIC FROM PASSING AND REPASSING THE OCCUPIED AREAS AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- LAI HOI PING AND ANOTHER v. PERSONS OCCUPYING PORTIONS OF NATHAN ROAD NEAR TO AND BETWEEN ARGYLE STREET AND DUNDAS STREET TO PREVENT OR OBSTRUCT NORMAL VEHICULAR TRAFFIC FROM PASSING AND REPASSING THE OCCUPIED AREAS AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP2975/2014
The applications to vary the costs orders nisi were refused and the orders made absolute because the purported grounds arose only at the oral hearing, did not justify leave to appeal, could and should have been addressed in the court below, and therefore costs follow the event; the costs of the variation applications are to form part of the costs of the leave applications and there shall be legal aid taxation of the 3rd defendant's own costs.