4 May 2022
香港特別行政區 訴 余穎盈
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 1215
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA552/2021
Although the judge accepted the appellant suffered from mixed anxiety and depressive disorder, the totality of evidence (notably CCTV, deliberate actions in the store, and recent psychiatric review showing no acute symptoms) demonstrated the appellant was not under the effects of mental illness or medication at the time and the prosecution proved theft beyond reasonable doubt; appellate intervention was unwarranted absent illogical or impossible findings.