16 Apr 2024
After conducting a rehearing and viewing the CCTV, the court accepted the trial judge's credibility findings and concluded beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant intentionally kicked the officer and did not act in bona fide self-defence; conviction was therefore upheld.
11 Sept 2023
The appeal was dismissed because the magistrate's factual and credibility findings—supported by witness evidence and CCTV—were reasonable; psychiatric evidence established a mental disorder making a hospital order under Cap 136 s45 appropriate; there was no basis for appellate interference and no effective remedy given the order had been completed.
17 Jul 2020
法院拒絕接納上訴人提交的事後精神病醫療報告，認為該等證據不符合接納新證據的要件，且原審記錄顯示辯方於初審時可供使用的資料已被考慮且上訴人於事發時主觀上認為其行為有法可依；憑閉路電視及車站職員證供，裁判官合理地推斷上訴人故意或罔顧風險致使受害人受傷，因此維持對侵害人身罪（第19條）之定罪及原判處100小時社會服務令的處分。