23 Jan 2026
香港特別行政區 訴 成柏傑（又名李杰明）及另一人
- Citation
- [2026] HKCA 85
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC72/2025
The trial judge's credibility findings and identification of D3 from CCTV/audio and PW1 evidence were reasonable and sufficient to establish joint enterprise liability beyond reasonable doubt; the attack was retaliatory not self‑defence; psychiatric evidence supported an indeterminate hospital order for D1; the sentences imposed, including D3's as instigator, were within appropriate range and not manifestly excessive.