7 Nov 2006
H v. H
- Citation
- H v. H
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV209/2006
The appeal was allowed because the petitioner's imminent loss of employment constituted a material change warranting reinstatement of the original Levy order from 1 November 2006; however the Chan order was allowed to stand for May–October 2006 only, subject to recalculation of contributions (apportioning household expenses 67:33 to children:wife, restoring respondent's sole responsibility for school/medical expenses) resulting in a net monthly contribution of HKD 21,000 for that period and a directed shortfall payment.