24 May 2012
JAH v. VH
- Citation
- JAH v. VH
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC14350/2009
The court concluded the application had been properly treated as an inter partes summons with abridged time rather than a true ex parte application; the first order was overly wide and should be discharged in part, but limited interim restraint orders on specific named assets and company interests were justified to protect assets already subject to the January 2011 consent order and because of real risk factors (including Cambodian proceedings); the matter should be transferred to the High Court for full argument and costs reserved.