23 May 2014
TAM MEI KAM v. HSBC INTERNATIONAL TRUSTEE LTD AND OTHERS
- Citation
- TAM MEI KAM v. HSBC INTERNATIONAL TRUSTEE LTD AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP2981/2004
The order refusing extra maintenance was a summary determination of substantive rights under O59 r21(1)(a) and thus not an interlocutory order requiring leave; alternatively, even if leave were required, the proposed appeal lacked a reasonable prospect of success because the requests were unreasonable given the temporary nature of the disability, the availability of specially adapted taxi services and the capacity of the existing live-in helper to discharge the tasks, therefore leave was refused and costs ordered.