10 Jun 2015
HKSAR v. ERUVATTAM KUNDIL ANIL
- Citation
- HKSAR v. ERUVATTAM KUNDIL ANIL
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA704/2014
Magistrate's adverse credibility findings were entitled to deference; appellant consented to Tamil interpretation and audio evidence showed he understood and responded in Tamil so no unfairness; admitted facts and cautioned statements established knowledge of possession and the factual arrangement (holding goods for reward) satisfied the employment element under the Immigration Ordinance; sentence conformed to guideline and was within appropriate range.