25 Feb 2010
HKSAR v. NACUA HAZEL CABIGAS
- Citation
- HKSAR v. NACUA HAZEL CABIGAS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA1019/2009
The notice under s.11 Cap.115 stipulated a fixed date for departure and did not create a period requiring computation; s.71(1) Cap.1 governs computation of time and therefore did not apply, so the appellant had to leave on or before 9 August and was rightly convicted for overstaying.