24 Sept 2004
HKSAR v. SO CHI LUNG
- Citation
- HKSAR v. SO CHI LUNG
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA888/2004
The DATC order was quashed because the court had no jurisdiction in principle to impose a rehabilitative DATC order to take effect while the appellant was serving an existing term of imprisonment; the appropriate sentence for possession of two tablets containing 0.02 grams of Midazolam was fixed at two months imprisonment, to run consecutively to the four months imprisonment for theft.