26 Jan 2018
A AND OTHERS v. THE HOUSING AUTHORITY
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 147
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT54/2017
The Court refused leave to appeal because on perusal of the arbitral award the arbitrator's construction — that the Relevant Works were replacement of window hinges valuated under Rates 1‑3 and that removal and brief storage are temporary incidental works not separately payable — was not obviously wrong nor open to serious doubt; therefore the high threshold for leave was not met and leave was dismissed with costs to the defendant.