15 Aug 2022
香港特別行政區 訴 關銘恆
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 2511
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA585/2021
The conviction was upheld because the trial judge reasonably accepted clear, consistent evidence from multiple independent lay witnesses who identified the appellant as one of five attackers; the video evidence admitted under s65C did not exculpate the appellant; joint participation could be inferred from the contemporaneous concerted conduct; there was no legal basis for appellate interference with the judge's credibility and factual findings.