24 Jun 2003
HKSAR v. YU WAI TUNG
- Citation
- HKSAR v. YU WAI TUNG
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC271/2002
The appeal was dismissed because the alleged inconsistency was illusory: count 1 related to transactions and a time period in which the key witness was not working for the applicant's company and relied on post‑transaction journal vouchers created for auditors, whereas counts 2 and 3 involved contemporaneous bank and ledger vouchers showing the applicant's signatures/initials; the jury were properly directed to treat the immunity witness with caution and to consider each count separately, and the appellant failed to show any contradiction requiring interference.