24 Apr 2015
樓外樓房地產咨詢有限公司 對 何志蘭
- Citation
- 樓外樓房地產咨詢有限公司 對 何志蘭
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP3202/2013
Court found respondent had not in fact received the arbitration hearing notice and thus established a ground under s95(2) (lack of proper notice / inability to present case). Although the court has discretion to allow enforcement despite such a ground, on the facts there were no compelling reasons to exercise that discretion in favour of enforcement; accordingly the enforcement orders were stayed and applicants were ordered to pay respondent's costs.