6 Sept 2022
香港特別行政區 訴 潘英華
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 2498
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA428/2020
法庭認為原審裁判官對控方第一證人的可信性裁定合情合理，未見不合情理或固有不可能之處；上訴人提出之六件所謂新證據多屬傳聞或上訴時才提出無合理解釋，故不予接納；綜合全部合法接納之證據可按無合理疑點標準證明普通襲擊罪，故駁回定罪上訴。
Hong Kong Case Law
Judicial impartiality and intervention
28 Feb 1992
R. v. LO SHU-KEUNG AND OTHERS
- Citation
- R. v. LO SHU-KEUNG AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC155/1991
The judge intervened repeatedly in a leading and prejudicial manner, demonstrated a closed mind before hearing full defence evidence and expressed conclusions about illegality and triad involvement without evidential basis; that conduct destroyed the appearance of a fair and impartial trial and rendered the convictions unsafe, requiring their quashing.