9 Jan 2006
袁靄儀 v. 協峰電子有限公司
- Citation
- 袁靄儀 v. 協峰電子有限公司
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA509/2004
Given the respondent's documented history of repetitive, abusive litigation and persistent disregard of court directions, it was necessary and proportionate to make a Restricted Proceedings Order and a Restricted Applications Order (RPO/RAO) limiting her ability to commence or pursue specified proceedings without leave; the RPO/RAO may extend to new subject matters related to prior conduct and to judicial review and tribunal proceedings where proportionate, but restrictions on appeals lie primarily with the Court of Appeal; the respondent's assorted interlocutory claims were dismissed as unme…