2 Apr 2026
X v. Y COMPANY
- Citation
- [2026] HKDC 549
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCMP5633/2025
Given the cogent evidence of internet fraud, the defendant's neutral stance and absence of evidence that account holders had directed account operation, the Court granted a Norwich Pharmacal order limited to specified particulars and narrowly defined records, and granted ancillary gagging, anonymity and no-inspection/sealing orders while emphasising that requests to hear in private and for secrecy must follow Practice Direction 25.1 and proper interim procedure for gagging orders must ordinarily be followed.