23 Jan 2001
MALCOLM ERNEST GRAY v. DIANE CARY BARBER GRAY
- Citation
- MALCOLM ERNEST GRAY v. DIANE CARY BARBER GRAY
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV121/2000
Court had jurisdiction to vary a consent lump sum order but refused to vary because petitioner failed to show the requisite material and unforeseen change; petitioner wilfully breached the consent order and was in contempt; committal was appropriate in principle but was suspended conditional on specified payments; an attachment of earnings order was required to secure compliance and the order was varied to remain in force until the judgment debt is paid.