4 May 2012
香港特別行政區 訴 陳金峯
- Citation
- 香港特別行政區 訴 陳金峯
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA770/2011
Conviction was unsafe because the proven facts (registered ownership, last driver, nervousness and a brief oral remark) were too weak and compatible with innocent explanations, and the package was concealed such that the only reasonable inference of knowledge by the appellant could not be drawn; appeal allowed and conviction quashed.