22 Nov 2022
廣豐台業主立案法團 v. NOMINSHARE LTD
- Citation
- [2022] HKLdT 63
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Case number
- LDBM109/2019
Because the respondent removed the complained installations before trial, the applicant substantially obtained the relief sought; the respondent did not establish a strong estoppel defence given ambiguous historical correspondence and prior enforcement attempts; balancing the parties' conduct the Tribunal awards the applicant the costs of the application with certificate for counsel, quantified at 75% of costs to be taxed at District Court scale, but makes no order as to costs for the summons and the applicant must bear costs relating to the withdrawn supplemental witness statement.