30 Jun 2005
ARFAN MUHAMMAD v. MPS ENGINEERING LTD AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- ARFAN MUHAMMAD v. MPS ENGINEERING LTD AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCPI457/2003
The psychiatrist's report was admissible because a psychiatrist's specialist opinion was necessary to diagnose and quantify psychiatric injury arising from the head trauma, the report was relevant to claims for psychiatric treatment costs and mitigation, and it satisfied the necessity, relevance and probative value test; the solicitor's prior obtaining of the report did not by itself warrant exclusion.