6 Aug 2015
KOMAL PATEL AND OTHERS v. CHRIS AU AND OTHERS
- Citation
- KOMAL PATEL AND OTHERS v. CHRIS AU AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA183/2014
Leave to appeal was refused because the judge concluded the appeal had no reasonable prospect of success: the injunction appropriately sought to preserve assets to satisfy the plaintiffs' overall claim (the frozen sum corresponded to that claim) and the complaint about no allowance for Retribution's legal fees did not justify variation where the funds were contested as belonging to the 1st defendant.