25 Mar 2010
RE LIGHT TIME INVESTMENTS LTD
- Citation
- RE LIGHT TIME INVESTMENTS LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP338/2010
The court refused the one‑stage approach because s.12A(2) creates a discretion that only arises upon payment into court and the court lacks jurisdiction to declare land free of encumbrances before payment; accordingly the court ordered payment into court under s.12A(1) but imposed advertising and timing conditions to protect unknown mortgagees and preserve the court's discretion under s.12A(2).