4 Oct 2016
RE NG TSUN WEI
- Citation
- RE NG TSUN WEI
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP1428/2016
The ex parte vesting order was refused because the Applicant failed to provide clear, satisfactory evidence that he is the sole beneficial owner and failed to discharge the duty of full and frank disclosure: material registered documents and the Lot 1978 Release indicate a later agreement (the 4th Action) that may have affected the Lands, and the Applicant did not explain or produce evidence as to its effect, so the court could not properly make a vesting order under s45(e).