14 Mar 2014
HKSAR v. CHENG CHEE-TOCK, THEODORE AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- HKSAR v. CHENG CHEE-TOCK, THEODORE AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC460/2012
On the whole evidence the trial judge was entitled to find that the 1st applicant retained a financial/beneficial interest in the 17/F property (directly or via an agent), that the transactions and use of BVI companies were designed to camouflage a connected transaction contrary to the Listing Rules and were dishonest, and that the 3rd applicant occupied a central role in orchestrating transfers and therefore had the requisite knowledge for money laundering; errors identified were immaterial and did not vitiate the convictions, so leave to appeal was dismissed.