13 Oct 2004
HKSAR v. CHAU HON KWONG
- Citation
- HKSAR v. CHAU HON KWONG
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC234/2004
The guilty verdicts for the 2nd and 3rd charges were quashed because the clerk failed to elicit from the foreman whether those guilty verdicts were unanimous or, if not, by what numerical majority they were reached, creating an ambiguity that vitiates the verdicts; the 1st charge conviction was upheld under the proviso after the applicant admitted possession of all drugs in the particulars of that charge; extension of time and leave to appeal were properly dealt with as set out.