10 Aug 2012
郭錦燊 v. 澤安閣業主立案法團
- Citation
- 郭錦燊 v. 澤安閣業主立案法團
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Case number
- LDBM357/2011
Clause 5(f) must be read as referring to the payment and apportionment mechanism in Clause 5(g)(ii) read with Clause 5(h); those provisions constitute the operative method for funding the costs under Clause 5(f), therefore the renovation costs approved by the EGMs are to be apportioned according to the management shares in the Schedule; Clause 5(g)(iii) does not apply to general maintenance items in dispute but, if it did, the Manager had effectively elected the management‑share apportionment by the estimate placed before the meeting.