6 May 2020
HKSAR v. ZAFAR ADNAN
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 678
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA462/2019
The appeal was dismissed because the magistrate's identification finding was sound, based on there being only one person observed performing the acts, an unobstructed continuous observation and immediate interception with inspection of the appellant's identity, so no lurking doubt undermined identification; and the particulars of the charge satisfied the Indictment Rules by providing reasonable information as to date, place, act and nature of offence—s38AA requires proof of an employment relationship but does not require proving the identity of the employer, therefore omission of the employer…