4 Mar 2004
HKSAR v. LAU WAI TIM
- Citation
- HKSAR v. LAU WAI TIM
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC152/2003
The trial judge was entitled on the evidence, including the recorded conversation and the applicant's prior testimony, to find that the applicant lied and that his memory defence was not supported; the contested phrasing about improvement and treatment did not render the factual findings unsafe. The conviction for perjury was therefore not unsafe and leave to appeal was dismissed.