27 Nov 1992
R. v.TSE CHUNG-FAT
- Citation
- R. v.TSE CHUNG-FAT
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC366/1991
Where a claimant has never presented a quantified bill or obtained express or tacit agreement as to extras, an unquantified suggestion of additional sums does not raise a bona fide claim of right to immediate payment; on the evidence the trial judge could properly infer the applicant acted dishonestly with intent to defraud when he altered and presented the withdrawal slip, so convictions for forgery and uttering stand; custodial sentences were unnecessary and were substituted by suspended sentences.