26 Jul 1994
R. v. CHAM TAK MING
- Citation
- R. v. CHAM TAK MING
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA527/1994
The magistrate, being in the best position to assess PW1's credibility, could find the appellant was party to threats and believed he had a right to demand repayment; because the defence did not raise that the appellant believed the menaces were a proper means, and the means were plainly improper, the appellant's lack of subjective belief need not be considered under R v Lawrence and Pomroy, so the conviction stands.